Legal Opinion
Mursch v. Van Dorn Co.
District Court, W.D. Wisconsin
Decided February 3, 1986No. 85-C-847-CPublishedCited by 12 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
CRABB, Chief Judge.
This action arises from plaintiffs discharge from employment as a sales representative for Central States Can Company. Plaintiff alleges that the sole reason for his termination was defendant’s desire to replace him with a younger man. Plaintiff asserts claims of wrongful discharge, breach of contract, and violation of the Wisconsin Fair Employment Act. Defendant has moved to dismiss the complaint for failure to state a claim, and has moved to strike all of plaintiff’s demands for relief other than lost wages.
FACTS
Taking the allegations of the amended complaint as…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Brockmeyer v. Dun & BradstreetWisconsin Supreme Court · 1983
- Brown & Williamson Tobacco Corporation v. Walter Jacobson and Cbs, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1983
- Watkins v. Labor & Industry Review CommissionWisconsin Supreme Court · 1984
- Ferraro v. KoelschWisconsin Supreme Court · 1985
- Kurtz v. City of WaukeshaWisconsin Supreme Court · 1979
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Tana J. Waid v. Merrill Area Public Schools, Dr. Strand Wedul and James BoettcherCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1996
- Dresser Industries, Inc., Waukesha Engine Division v. The Gradall CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1992
- Atkinson v. Halliburton Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1995
- Bourque v. Wausau Hospital CenterCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1988
- Bruce T. Mursch v. Van Dorn Company, D/B/A Central States Can CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1988
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.