People v. Winfield
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
1Opinion of the Court
— Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the County Court, Dutchess County (Hillery, J.), rendered July 31, 1984, convicting him of grand larceny in the third degree (two counts), upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence.
*450Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.
The trial court’s Sandoval ruling (People v Sandoval, 34 NY2d 371), which permitted the prosecutor to cross-examine the defendant for impeachment purposes concerning the underlying facts of certain prior convictions involving primarily theft-related crimes, in the event the defendant testified at the trial, was not an improvident…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- People v. SandovalNew York Court of Appeals · 1974
- People v. GloverNew York Court of Appeals · 1982
- People v. PavaoNew York Court of Appeals · 1983
- People v. RahmanNew York Court of Appeals · 1979
- People v. RahmanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1978
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by22 opinions
- People v. JulienAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2012
- People v. RadoncicAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1999
- People v. PowersAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1999
- People v. KellandAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1994
- People v. ChamberlainAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1991
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.