People v. Rahman
New York Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
Memorandum.
The order of the Appellate Division should be affirmed.
The record does not demonstrate that the trial court abused its discretion when it ruled that the prosecution would be permitted to impeach the credibility of the defendant, if he took the stand, by confronting him with two of his prior narcotics convictions. Indeed, there is nothing to indicate that the court did not in fact actually balance the probative worth of the impeaching material against the risk that it might be taken as an indication of a propensity to commit the crimes charged and the fear that…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- People v. SandovalNew York Court of Appeals · 1974
- People v. CavinessNew York Court of Appeals · 1975
- People v. MayrantNew York Court of Appeals · 1977
3Cited by127 opinions
- People v. PavaoNew York Court of Appeals · 1983
- People v. HayesNew York Court of Appeals · 2002
- People v. StromanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1981
- People v. SpringerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2004
- People v. DahlbenderAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2005
122 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.