Harvey v. Deep River Logging Co.
Oregon Supreme Court
From Multnomah: Arthur L. Frazer, Judge. Action by James F. Harvey against the Deep River Logging Co. Judgment for plaintiff. Defendant appeals.
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
Mr. Chiep Justice Bean.
This is a personal injury ease. The defendant is a corporation engaged in the logging business in the State of Washington, and, as a part of its appliances, owns and operates a logging *584steam railroad from a landing on Deep River to its logging camp, a distance of about four miles. The equipment of the road consists of three engines and the necessary logging trucks. A logging truck is a platform about six by ten feet in size, supported by four wheels, upon which one end of a log rests while being hauled; the other end resting upon a similar truck. The defendant…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Galena & Chicago Union R. R. v. FayIllinois Supreme Court · 1855
- Chicago, Burlington & Quincy Railroad v. HazzardIllinois Supreme Court · 1861
- Wagner v. Missouri Pacific Railway Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1888
- Simmons v. Oregon RailroadOregon Supreme Court · 1902
- Johnson's ex'x v. Jennings' adm'rSupreme Court of Virginia · 1853
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Tennessee Central Railroad v. VanhoyTennessee Supreme Court · 1920
- McGregor v. Great Northern Railway Co.North Dakota Supreme Court · 1915
- Lamm v. Silver Falls Timber Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1929
- Perkins v. GallowaySupreme Court of Alabama · 1915
- Lawrence v. Kaul Lumber Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1911
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.