Johnson's ex'x v. Jennings' adm'r
Supreme Court of Virginia
The facts of this case are stated in the opinion of the court. There was a verdict for the defendant; and Johnson’s executrix applied to this court for a supersedeas, which was allowed.
1Opinion of the CourtMoncure, J.
*3This was an action of assumpsit, brought by John F. Johnson, and afterwards revived by his executrix, against Henry Dunnington, administrator of Philip Jennings. The original declaration contained only the three common counts. There were two amended declarations. The last count of the first, and the last two counts of the second, amended declaration, were special counts; in which it was stated, that Jennings, in his life time, being, indebted to Johnson in various sums of money on various accounts, as therein mentioned, it was agreed between them that Jennings, in consideration of said…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Rowt's adm'x. v. Kile's adm'r.Supreme Court of Virginia · 1829
- Bowles' Ex'or v. Elmore's Adm'xSupreme Court of Virginia · 1851
3Cited by4 opinions
- State v. CliffordWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1906
- Roller v. MurraySupreme Court of Virginia · 1911
- Harvey v. Deep River Logging Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1907
- Riverside Residence Co. v. HustedSupreme Court of Virginia · 1909