Legal Opinion

Bornemann v. Lusha

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided April 28, 1936PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtFritz, J.

The judgments appealed from were based upon certain undisputed facts and certain other facts found in a special verdict of a jury. In that verdict the court directed a finding that James H. Lusha, through his employees, was negligent in parking or leaving his .truck standing upon the *361highway when it was practical to park or leave it standing off the roadway, and that Bornemann’s injury was a result of that negligence; and that, on the other hand, Bornemann was negligent in failing to keep a sufficient lookout and sufficient control of his car, and that his injury was the result of his…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Rusch v. Sentinel-News Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1933

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Dixie Drive It Yourself System New Orleans Co. v. American Beverage Co.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1962
  2. Hayungs v. FalkSupreme Court of Iowa · 1947
  3. Jennings v. Mueller Transportation Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1955
  4. Robinson v. Briggs Transportation Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1956
  5. Johann v. Milwaukee Electric Tool Corp.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1953

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API