Legal Opinion
Siegel v. State
District Court of Appeal of Florida
Decided October 10, 1991No. 91-1842PublishedCited by 19 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
586 So.2d 1341 (1991)
Jacob SIEGEL, Appellant,
v.
STATE of Florida, Appellee.
No. 91-1842.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.
October 10, 1991.
Jacob Siegel, pro se.
No appearance for appellee.
DIAMANTIS, Judge.
Appellant appeals from an order summarily denying a motion for post-conviction relief pursuant to rule 3.850 of the Florida Rules of Criminal Procedure. We affirm in part, reverse in part, and remand for proceedings consistent with this opinion.
After having pled guilty or nolo contendere to the offenses of burglary of a dwelling and grand theft, appellant received a sentence…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- State v. BolyeaSupreme Court of Florida · 1988
- Dean v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1991
- Frazier v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1984
- Shell v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1987
- Simmons v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1986
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by19 opinions
- Grosvenor v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 2004
- Brazeail v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2002
- McCoy v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1992
- Mason v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1999
- Cousino v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2000
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.