Legal Opinion

Brazeail v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided July 9, 2002No. 1D02-0763PublishedCited by 28 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

821 So.2d 364 (2002)

Thomas E. BRAZEAIL, Appellant,

v.

STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 1D02-0763.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

July 9, 2002.

Pro se, Appellant.

Robert A. Butterworth, Attorney General, and James W. Rogers, Assistant Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Appellee.

ALLEN, C.J.

The appellant challenges the order by which the trial court summarily denied his Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.850 motion for post-conviction relief. Concluding that the appellant's motion sets forth a colorable claim for relief on the theory that his trial attorney misadvised him as to…

2Cases cited26 opinions

  1. Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Hill v. LockhartSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  3. United States v. CronicSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  4. McMann v. RichardsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
  5. Evitts v. LuceySupreme Court of the United States · 1985

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by28 opinions

  1. Grosvenor v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 2004
  2. Bruno v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2003
  3. Murphy v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2006
  4. Panchu v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2009
  5. Richardson v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2002

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API