People v. Bailey
Appellate Court of Illinois
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Van Deusen
The defendants in these consolidated cases were charged separately by complaint or amended complaint with the offense of obscenity in violation of section 11 — 20(a)(1) of the Criminal Code of 1961 (Ill. Rev. Stat. 1981, ch. 38, par. 11 — 20(a)(1)). The trial court, relying upon People v. Ridens (1974), 59 Ill. 2d 362, cert, denied (1975), 421 U.S. 993, 44 L. Ed. 2d 483, 95 S. Ct. 2000, found the complaints to be insufficient because they did not include the third definitional element of the offense of obscenity, namely that the materials were “utterly without redeeming social value.” The…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Ward v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
- People v. RidensIllinois Supreme Court · 1974
- Ridens Et Al. v. Illinois Et Al.Supreme Court of the United States · 1975
- People v. DyerAppellate Court of Illinois · 1977
- People v. YoungAppellate Court of Illinois · 1973
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Collins v. County of KendallCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1986
- Sharon Collins v. County Of KendallCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1986
- People v. PopeAppellate Court of Illinois · 1985
- People v. Sequoia Books, Inc.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1986