Legal Opinion

Hildebrand v. Graves

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided June 15, 1925PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Hart, J.,

(after stating the facts). At the outset it may be stated that the order of the probate court by which an effort was made to vest the land absolutely in the widow, having been made during the minority of the children, is void. Larkin Murphy died in 1878 intestate, and at the time of his death the land was his homestead. His widow continued to reside on the homestead with their minor children, and the order of the probate court was made in 1884, while the children were yet minors.

In Sansom v. Harrell, 51 Ark. 429, it was held that since the adoption of the Constitution of 1874, which…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Matlock v. ReppySupreme Court of Arkansas · 1886
  2. Miles v. JerrySupreme Court of Arkansas · 1923
  3. DuFresne v. PaulSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1920
  4. Smith v. ScottSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1909
  5. Caldcleugh v. CaldcleughSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1923

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Clay v. BrandSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1963
  2. Arkansas Valley Compress & Warehouse Co. v. MorganSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1950
  3. Jolley v. MeekSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1932
  4. Bridges v. United Savings AssociationSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1969
  5. Murphy v. GravesSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1926

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API