Legal Opinion

Jolley v. Meek

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided March 14, 1932PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Butler., J.,

(after stating the facts). The appellee insists that, because of the failure of the appellant tu abstract certain instruments, exhibits to the pleadings and testimony, there has been a failure to comply with rule-9 of this court. "We are Of the opinion that this cohtem tion cannot be sustained because the pleadings’and téstimony abstracted are sufficient to give us an understanding of the issues involved.

We pretermit the second question raised by the appellee, i. e., that the record is insufficient in that the oral testimony taken was not properly preserved by a bill Of…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Interstate Business Men's Accident Ass'n v. SandersonSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1920
  2. Ward v. StarkSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1909
  3. Hildebrand v. GravesSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1925
  4. Harris v. BushSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1917
  5. Clifford v. Federal Bank & Trust Co.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1929

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Maloy v. Stuttgart Memorial HospitalSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1994
  2. The Western Union Telegraph Co. v. Byrd, Adm'x.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1938
  3. Knighton v. International Paper Co.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1969
  4. O'Kane v. First National Bank of ParisSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1934
  5. Ledbetter v. SmithSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1941

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API