Legal Opinion
United States v. Fletcher Sapp and Ronald Sapp
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
Decided April 18, 1995No. 94-3077 to 94-3079PublishedCited by 38 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
TACHA, Circuit Judge.
The government charged defendants with violating 18 U.S.C. §§ 1014 and 1344(2). A jury convicted defendants of violating only section 1344(2). Defendants were sentenced and now appeal to this court. We exercise jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1291 and affirm.
I. BACKGROUND
Defendants are brothers who jointly operated a number of businesses. In 1990 defendants began experiencing financial difficulties. After defendants defaulted on some of their loans' at First State Bank (“First State”), they began negotiating for new loans from Midland Bank (“Midland”) to pay off…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Hughey v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
- United States v. Pamela Sue Hollis, United States of America v. William T. "Tom" HollisCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1992
- United States v. Marilyn Kay KelleyCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1991
- United States v. Kenneth Eugene HaddockCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1992
- United States v. Roderick K. DirdenCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1994
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by38 opinions
- United States v. IvyCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1996
- United States v. Brian L. Miller, United States of America v. Michael Ray HicksCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1996
- United States v. John J. PappertCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1997
- United States v. Nick Alfred Owens, United States of America v. Kevin Lee JohnsonCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1995
- United States v. Quentin T. Wiles, United States of America v. Patrick J. SchleibaumCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1996
33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.