Legal Opinion
Jaquetta McCall v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Ins. Co.
District Court, D. South Carolina
Decided October 15, 2025No. 2:24-cv-04520Unknown
1Opinion
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF SOUTH CAROLINA CHARLESTON DIVISION Jaquetta McCall, Case No. 2:24-cv-4520-RMG Plaintiff, v. ORDER AND OPINION State Farm Mutual Automobile Ins. Co., Defendant. Before the Court is Defendant’s motion for summary judgment (Dkt. No. 19). For the reasons stated below, the Court denies Defendant’s motion. Background Plaintiff alleges that Defendant, her automobile insurer, is in breach of its Underinsured Motorist (“UIM”) policy and has acted in bad faith for refusing to pay benefits under Plaintiff’s UIM coverage. (Dkt. No. 1-1). The following…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- United States v. Diebold, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1962
- Myers v. State Farm Mutual Automobile InsuranceDistrict Court, D. South Carolina · 1997
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.