Armour v. Concord Mutual Insurance
Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Philadelphia County
1Opinion of the Court
MARUTANI, J.,
PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND
Defendant, Concord Mutual Insurance Company (Concord Mutual), the automobile liability insurance carrier for plaintiff, Patricia C. Armour (Armour), has filed prehminary objections to plaintiffs complaint in equity. By her complaint, plaintiff seeks rehef for payment of lost wages, medical expenses incurred, 18 percent interest thereon, attorney’s fees, as well as an order directing future payment of losses and expenses, plus punitive damages.
Concord Mutual’s prehminary objections are: (a) motion to strike, contending that plaintiff has “a full, complete, and…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Chambers v. MontgomerySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1963
- Hudock v. Donegal Mutual InsuranceSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1970
- Davis v. O'BrienSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1974
- Moskowitz v. Prudential Insurance Co. of AmericaSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1946