Legal Opinion
Claim of Gill v. Belmar Construction Co.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided September 19, 1929PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtVan Kirk, P. J.
The sole question in the case is whether or not the accidental injuries arose out of and in the course of the employment. There is no dispute in the facts. The claimant was-employed as a chauffeur and was from time to time assigned to, and performed, other work. On May 8, 1928, he was directed to assist the foreman who had charge of blasting work. He was directed by the foreman to bring sticks of dynamite and caps to the work. He had picked up a number of sticks of dynamite and six caps. He noticed that one of the caps did not have the usual wire attached. Of this he informed the foreman, who…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Claim of Dependents of Marks v. GrayNew York Court of Appeals · 1929
- Matter of Daly v. . Bates RobertsNew York Court of Appeals · 1918
- Matter of Davidson v. Pansy Waist CompanyNew York Court of Appeals · 1925
- Matter of Lampert v. . SiemonsNew York Court of Appeals · 1923
3Cited by2 opinions
- Thornton v. Chamberlain Manufacturing Corp.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1973
- Daniello v. MacHise Express Co.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1972