Legal Opinion

Litman v. Litman

New York Supreme Court

Decided August 10, 1982PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

Vincent R. Balletta, J.

This is a motion in which the defendant seeks to require the plaintiff to pay certain sums of money to enable the defendant to retain accountants, appraisers, and financial experts to evaluate certain marital property. The defendant had previously made a motion for the same relief and the motion was denied by order of this court dated October 23, 1981. In that order, Justice Pantano determined that the court did not have sufficient data upon which to make a determination, and indicated that before there could be any order directing the outlay of…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Roussos v. RoussosNew York Supreme Court · 1980
  2. Fay v. FayNew York Supreme Court · 1981
  3. Gueli v. GueliNew York Supreme Court · 1981
  4. Wells v. WellsNew York Supreme Court · 1981

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Dugan v. DuganSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1983
  2. Ahern v. AhernAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1983
  3. Kaye v. KayeAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1984
  4. Litman v. LitmanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1983
  5. Cherno v. ChernoNew York Supreme Court · 1983

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API