Legal Opinion
Fay v. Fay
New York Supreme Court
Decided March 25, 1981PublishedCited by 12 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
Oscar Murov, J.
An issue to be resolved in this action which is governed by the new equitable distribution law (L 1980, ch 281) involves one of first impression, namely, how the courts may treat, upon a proper showing, a request by one party for a direction by the court, pendente lite, to have the other party pay a sum of money to enable the needy spouse to retain a pension actuary for purposes of evaluating, on behalf of the requesting spouse, a pension or other employee benefit which she seeks to have included within the concept of “marital property”. (L 1980, ch 281, §…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Miller v. MillerMichigan Court of Appeals · 1978
- Elliott v. ElliottSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1978
- Gueli v. GueliNew York Supreme Court · 1981
3Cited by12 opinions
- Damiano v. DamianoAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1983
- Deering v. DeeringCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1981
- Ahern v. AhernAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1983
- Kaye v. KayeAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1984
- Zirinsky v. ZirinskyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1988
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.