Cherno v. Cherno

OPINION OF THE COURT

Vincent R. Balletta, J.

This is a motion by the plaintiff for an order directing the defendant to answer certain interrogatories.

In this matrimonial action, the plaintiff has served upon the defendant a first set of interrogatories, along with a supplement thereto. On this motion, the plaintiff argues that the defendant has not sufficiently answered with respect to five interrogatories, specifically interrogatories Nos. 9, 12, 23, 39, and supplemental interrogatory No. 4.

The defendant is a practicing attorney and a partner in a New York City law firm. Interrogatories Nos. 9…