Legal Opinion
Securities & Exchange Commission v. Kimmes
District Court, N.D. Illinois
Decided February 25, 1991No. 89 C 5942PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER
SHADUR, District Judge.
On August 3, 1989 the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”) brought this action against 14 individuals and two corporations, charging a large-scale securities fraud in the marketing and sale of low-priced securities (so-called “penny stocks”). This opinion deals with the legal issues that have arisen out of the alleged failure of defendant Thomas Quinn (“Quinn”) to obey this Court’s September 1, 1989 Order of Preliminary Injunction and Other Equitable Relief (the “Order”).
Quinn was incarcerated at the Maison d’Arrét de la Santé in Paris,…
2Cases cited25 opinions
- Illinois v. AllenSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
- United States v. United Mine Workers of AmericaSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
- Snyder v. MassachusettsSupreme Court of the United States · 1934
- Gompers v. Bucks Stove & Range Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1911
- Maryland v. CraigSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Smith v. SmithCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1998
- Minneapolis Employees Retirement Fund v. Allison-Williams Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1994
- Holmes v. BACK DOCTORS, LTD.District Court, S.D. Illinois · 2010
- United States v. EdmondsonDistrict Court, E.D. Texas · 1998
- Cynthia S. Holmes, P.C. v. Back Doctors, Ltd.District Court, S.D. Illinois · 2010
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.