Legal Opinion

Minneapolis Employees Retirement Fund v. Allison-Williams Co.

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided June 30, 1994No. C6-93-844PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

TOMLJANOVICH, Justice.

At issue is whether the district court properly granted summary judgment to appellants Allison-Williams and Robert Tengdin on claims by respondent Minneapolis Employees Retirement Fund (“MERF”) that appellants violated the Minnesota Securities Act and were negligent in connection with the sale of securities to MERF. 1 The court of appeals held that material issues of fact precluded entry of summary judgment on both claims, 508 N.W.2d 805. We reverse the court of appeals and reinstate summary judgment in favor of Allison-Williams and Robert Tengdin. 2

MERF is a…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Aaron v. Securities & Exchange CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  2. Carol O'COnnOr v. R.F. Lafferty & Company, Inc. And Roy A. FoulkeCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1992
  3. Hudson v. Snyder Body, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1982
  4. Fed. Sec. L. Rep. P 96,539 Richard I. Clark, as of the Estate of Bernice C. Grupe v. John Lamula Investors, Inc. And John J. LamulaCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1978
  5. Hartmon v. National Heater Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1953

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Domagala v. RollandSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2011
  2. TROOIEN v. MansourCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2010
  3. Myers v. Nebraska Investment CouncilNebraska Supreme Court · 2006
  4. Johnson v. John Hancock FundsCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 2006
  5. In Re Shigellosis LitigationCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2002

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API