Legal Opinion

United States v. Edmondson

District Court, E.D. Texas

Decided July 22, 1998No. 4:96-cv-00063PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

COURT’S FINDINGS REGARDING SENTENCING BY VIDEO CONFERENCE

SCHELL, Chief Judge.

I. Background of this Case

On December 12, 1996, a federal grand jury returned a two-count indictment against Samuel Pasqual Edmondson (Edmondson), Salvador Vargas Navarro (Navarro), and Guadalupe Plascencia Lopez (Lopez). Count 1 charged the defendants with conspiracy to possess methamphetamine with the intent to distribute or dispense the drug, in violation of 21 U.S.C. § 846 and 18 U.S.C. § 2. Count 2 charged the defendants with possession with the intent to distribute or dispense more than 100 grams of…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Maryland v. CraigSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
  2. Lewis v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1892
  3. Green v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1961
  4. United States v. BehrensSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  5. United States v. Juan M. Gordon, (Two Cases)Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1987

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. United States v. Salvador Vargas Navarro Samuel Pasqual EdmondsonCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1999
  2. Edwards v. LoganDistrict Court, W.D. Virginia · 1999
  3. United States v. NavarroCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1999
  4. United States v. Salvador Vargas Navarro Samuel Pasqual EdmondsonCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1999

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API