Legal Opinion

People v. Tarka

New York Court of Appeals

Decided May 8, 1990PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

Memorandum.

The order of the Appellate Term should be reversed, the judgment of conviction vacated and the information dismissed.

To be facially sufficient, an information must contain allegations of every element of the offense charged and the defendant’s commission thereof (CPL 100.40 [1] [c]; 100.15 [3]). Inasmuch as the information charging defendant with disorderly conduct fails to allege the essential element of either intent or recklessness (see, Penal Law §240.20 [3]), as the People concede, the information is jurisdictionally defective and must be dismissed (see,…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. People v. AlejandroNew York Court of Appeals · 1987
  2. People v. HallNew York Court of Appeals · 1979

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. People v. CobbCriminal Court of the City of New York · 2003
  2. People v. PalmerCriminal Court of the City of New York · 1998
  3. People v. MansonCriminal Court of the City of New York · 1997
  4. People v. Krathaus, New York County Courts1999
  5. People v. HannemanAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 2008

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API