Legal Opinion

Durm v. Fish

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided June 22, 1881PublishedCited by 9 opinions

Error to Berrien. Ejectment. Defendant brings error.

1Opinion of the CourtCooley, J.

Fish was plaintiff in the court below, and sought to recover in ejectment the possession of certain premises in Niles which he claimed under a mortgage foreclosure. The mortgage which was foreclosed was given to him by one Moses Davis, and bore date May 15,1865. The mortgaged premises were therein described as “ all that part of the southeast quarter of section twenty-seven in town seven south of range seventeen west lying east of the Michigan Central Railroad and bounded south and east by section lines, on the north by land owned and occupied by John B. Reddieh, and on the west by land owned…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Lee v. MasonMichigan Supreme Court · 1862
  2. Udell v. KahnMichigan Supreme Court · 1875

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Sweet Air Investment, Inc v. KenneyMichigan Court of Appeals · 2007
  2. Gage v. SanbornMichigan Supreme Court · 1895
  3. Walker v. SchultzMichigan Supreme Court · 1913
  4. Thomas v. ThomasMontana Supreme Court · 1911
  5. Keyes v. SherwoodMichigan Supreme Court · 1888

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API