Legal Opinion

Carrolton Associates v. Abrams

New York Supreme Court

Decided July 18, 1968PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMatthew M. Levy, J.

(I)

The central entity in this case, although not a party litigant, is Towers Marts International, Inc. Towers had leased some 18 premises from various landlords in a number of States and established shopping centers or discount stores thereon. Towers then rented portions of the premises to various so-called ‘1 concessionaires ’ ’, who conducted their respective specialty shops for the sale of separate types of merchandise in the Towers ’ stores and under the ostensible management and operation of Towers itself. As the controller in each retail store, Towers daily received the proceeds of the…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. International Shoe Co. v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
  2. Mullane v. Central Hanover Bank & Trust Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1950
  3. Hanson v. DencklaSupreme Court of the United States · 1958
  4. McGee v. International Life InsuranceSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
  5. Hess v. PawloskiSupreme Court of the United States · 1927

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Leab v. StreitDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1984
  2. El Cid, Ltd. v. New Jersey Zinc Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 1983
  3. In re the Arbitration between Jevremov & CrisciAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1987
  4. Healy v. BrotmanNew York Supreme Court · 1978
  5. Drutman Realty Co. Limited Partnership v. Jindo Corp.District Court, S.D. New York · 1994

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API