Legal Opinion
El Cid, Ltd. v. New Jersey Zinc Co.
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided December 15, 1983No. 76 Civ. 1388 (WK)PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM & ORDER
KNAPP, District Judge.
Plaintiff El Cid, Ltd. (“El Cid”) has claimed in its amended complaint that the various defendants, acting in concert, 1 engaged in illegal activities in connection with the purchase of the rights to mine the Bolgol mining concessions (“the Bolgol”) in Bolivia’s gold-rich Tipuani Valley. Plaintiff alleged, first, that defendants’ actions violated the Sherman and Wilson Tariff Acts (15 U.S.C. § 1, 15 U.S.C. § 8); second, that defendants interfered with its contractual, precontractual, and business relationships with respect to its own attempts to…
2Cases cited25 opinions
- Klaxon Co. v. Stentor Electric Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1941
- Vanity Fair Mills, Inc. v. The T. Eaton Co. Limited and John David EatonCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1956
- Intercontinental Planning, Ltd. v. Daystrom Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 1969
- Hall v. EI Du Pont De Nemours & Co., Inc.District Court, E.D. New York · 1972
- Nader v. General Motors Corp.New York Court of Appeals · 1970
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- In Re SpanoUnited States Bankruptcy Court, D. Connecticut · 1993
- In Re Spanish Cay Co., Ltd.United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. Florida. · 1993
- Maison Lazard Et Compagnie v. Manfra, Tordella & Brooks, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 1984
- Geron ex rel. Thelen LLP v. Robinson & Cole LLPDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2012
- Transunion Corp. v. Pepsico, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 1986
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.