Legal Opinion
Max Factor & Co. v. Factor
District Court, S.D. California
Decided September 17, 1963No. 62-1660PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
CRARY, District Judge.
Plaintiff seeks judgment permanently •enjoining defendant from use of the name “Max Factor” or any colorable imitation of plaintiff’s trademarks “Max Factor” and “Max Factor of Hollywood” as a brand name or trademark for hosiery, or any product similar or related to the products of plaintiff, and for damages for trademark infringement and for unfair competition. Section 1114, Title 15 United States Code, concerns trademark infringement and provides, in substance, that to establish infringement one must prove, (1) use in commerce of a reproduction, copy or colorable…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Yale Electric Corporation v. RobertsonCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1928
- Stork Restaurant, Inc. v. SahatiCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1948
- The Fleischmann Distilling Corp., a Corporation, Etc. v. Maier Brewing Company, a CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1963
- Aunt Jemima Mills Co. v. Rigney & Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1917
- L. E. Waterman Co. v. Modern Pen Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1914
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Taylor Wine Company, Inc. v. Bully Hill Vineyards, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1978
- Caesars World, Inc. v. Caesar's PalaceDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 1980
- Fotomat Corp. v. Photo Drive-Thru, Inc.District Court, D. New Jersey · 1977
- Bertolli USA, Inc. v. Filippo Bertolli Fine Foods, Ltd.District Court, S.D. New York · 1987
- Kelly Girl Service, Inc. v. RobertsDistrict Court, E.D. Louisiana · 1965
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.