Legal Opinion
Commonwealth v. Hilliard
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
Decided February 28, 1977No. 493, 518PublishedCited by 83 opinions
1Per curiam
A majority of the Court agrees that the judgment of sentence should be reversed and a new trial granted.
*321Mr. Justice Roberts files an Opinion Announcing the Judgment of the Court, stating two grounds for reversal and grant of a new trial. Mr. Justice O’Brien joins Part II of the Opinion Announcing the Judgment of the Court. Mr. Justice Nix joins Part I of the Opinion Announcing the Judgment of the Court. Mr. Justice Manderino joins Parts I and II of the Opinion Announcing the Judgment of the Court.
Mr. Justice EAGEN files a Dissenting Opinion in which Mr. Chief Justice JONES and Mr. Justice…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Brady v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- United States v. AgursSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- People v. HobsonNew York Court of Appeals · 1976
- Commonwealth v. CainSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1977
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by83 opinions
- State v. StephensonTennessee Supreme Court · 1994
- State v. HaynesOregon Supreme Court · 1979
- State v. StoddardSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1988
- Commonwealth v. RodgersSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1977
- Commonwealth v. EnglandSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1977
78 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.