Legal Opinion

Holmes v. Sikes

Supreme Court of Georgia

Decided May 23, 1901PublishedCited by 7 opinions

Quo warranto. Before Judge Spence. Worth superior court. April 23, 1901.

1Opinion of the CourtCobb, J.

An information in the nature of a quo warranto against Robert A. Holmes was filed in the superior court by Wooten, solicitor-general, on the relation of W. L. Sikes, after leave to file it had been duly granted. It was alleged in the information that at an election held for the office of mayor of the town of Sylvester, at which the relator and the defendant were candidates, the relator received a majority of the votes cast, and was duly commissioned as mayor; that on contest proceedings filed before the ordinary by the defendant, who was, prior to the election, the incumbent of the office, a…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Churchill v. WalkerSupreme Court of Georgia · 1882
  2. Gough v. St. JohnNew York Supreme Court · 1837
  3. Attorney General v. City of SalemMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1869
  4. Whelchel v. State ex rel. WileySupreme Court of Georgia · 1886
  5. Morris v. UnderwoodSupreme Court of Georgia · 1856

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Sweat v. BarnhillSupreme Court of Georgia · 1930
  2. Sutton v. AdamsSupreme Court of Georgia · 1934
  3. Morris v. PetersSupreme Court of Georgia · 1948
  4. Albright v. Territory of New Mexico ex rel. SandovalNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1905
  5. Cummings v. RobinsonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1942

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API