Legal Opinion

Blair v. Hanna

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided November 15, 1882No. 9762PublishedCited by 9 opinions

From the Montgomery Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the CourtElliott, J.

The appellants’ complaint alleges that Adam P. Hanna, one of the appellees, was indebted to the appellants in the year 1868, and that they recovered judgment for the debts due them; that after the debts were created Hanna bought the real estate described in the complaint, and, for the purpose of defrauding his creditors, caused it to be conveyed to his brothers John and George Hanna; that after this purchase and conveyance Adam P. Hanna was adjudged a bankrupt; that he fraudulently concealed his ownership of the land, and that it never went into the hands of his assignee.

We think the court…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Glenny v. LangdonSupreme Court of the United States · 1878
  2. Lathrop v. DrakeSupreme Court of the United States · 1876
  3. Trimble v. WoodheadSupreme Court of the United States · 1881
  4. Gimbel v. StolteIndiana Supreme Court · 1877
  5. Truitt v. TruittIndiana Supreme Court · 1871

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Elston v. CastorIndiana Supreme Court · 1885
  2. Sherwood v. City of LafayetteIndiana Supreme Court · 1887
  3. Voorhees v. CarpenterIndiana Supreme Court · 1891
  4. Falco v. Kaupisch Creamery Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1903
  5. Jenkins v. NewmanIndiana Supreme Court · 1890

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API