Legal Opinion

Falco v. Kaupisch Creamery Co.

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided January 26, 1903PublishedCited by 11 opinions

From Multnomah: Alfred F. Sears, Jr., Judge. Action by Joseph Falco against the Kaupisch Creamery Co. and others. Plaintiff appeals from an order sustaining a demurrer to the complaint.

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Bean

This is an appeal from a decree sustaining a demurrer to the complaint in a suit brought by a creditor of an insolvent corporation against the stockholders thereof to recover and to have applied to the debts of the concern alleged unpaid subscriptions to the capital stock. From the complaint it appears that on and prior to January 28,1899, Julius C. Kaupisch and H. W. Kaupisch were partners, doing business at Portland, under the firm name of Kaupisch Creamery, with property and good will of the value of $5,000, and no more; that it was agreed about that time between them and the defendants T.…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Sanger v. UptonSupreme Court of the United States · 1875
  2. Sawyer v. HoagSupreme Court of the United States · 1873
  3. Glenny v. LangdonSupreme Court of the United States · 1878
  4. Patterson v. LyndeSupreme Court of the United States · 1883
  5. In re Crystal Spring Bottling Co.District Court, D. Vermont · 1899

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Sargent v. American Bank & Trust Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1916
  2. Macbeth v. BanfieldOregon Supreme Court · 1904
  3. Allen v. GrantSupreme Court of Georgia · 1905
  4. Lewis v. First National BankOregon Supreme Court · 1904
  5. Moore Mfg. Co. v. BillingsOregon Supreme Court · 1905

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API