Borland v. Borland
California Court of Appeal
The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtLangdon, P. J.
This is an appeal by the defendant from a judgment against her for $450 upon a contract by which, for a valuable consideration, she guaranteed the payment of $50 a month alimony to plaintiff, which sum, said contract recited, had been allowed to plaintiff by a decree of divorce duly entered in her favor dissolving the marriage between her and John H. Borland, the son of the present defendant.
In the present action the defendant filed an answer admitting the execution of the contract set out in the complaint and the fact that $450 past due thereunder had not been paid by her son nor by herself…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Garwood v. GarwoodCalifornia Supreme Court · 1866
- In Re Estate of BellCalifornia Supreme Court · 1908
- Elizalde v. MurphyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1912
- Koehler v. Holt Manufacturing Co.California Supreme Court · 1905
- Southern Pacific Co. v. EdmundsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1914
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Price v. Sixth District Agricultural Assn.California Supreme Court · 1927
- Gas Appliance Sales Co. v. W. B. Bastian Manufacturing Co.California Court of Appeal · 1927
- In Re GuryCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1930
- Short v. ShortCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1930
- Kerrigan v. MaloofCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1950
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.