Miller v. Miller
Idaho Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
BISTLINE, Justice.
In May 1984 the Bannock County Commissioners, pursuant to a petition, had formed a herd district which encompassed the Millers’ land together with portions of BLM land. The herd district ordinance was in effect at the time the damages were caused by E. Paul Millers’ grazing livestock.
E. Paul Miller and Pete Miller are brothers who own or lease adjoining lands in Bannock County; some of those lands also adjoin property owned by the Federal Bureau of Land Management (hereinafter BLM lands). Pete’s initial action was filed in small claims court, where damages were claimed based…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- State v. ClarkIdaho Supreme Court · 1965
- Maguire v. YankeIdaho Supreme Court · 1978
- Nagel v. HammondIdaho Supreme Court · 1965
- Clyde Hess Distributing Co. v. Bonneville CountyIdaho Supreme Court · 1949
- Beinhorn v. GriswoldMontana Supreme Court · 1902
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Credit Bureau of Eastern Idaho, Inc. v. LecheminantIdaho Supreme Court · 2010
- Belstler v. ShelerIdaho Supreme Court · 2011
- Marchbanks v. RollIdaho Supreme Court · 2005
- Miller v. MillerIdaho Supreme Court · 1987
- Radford v. Van OrdenIdaho Supreme Court · 2021
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.