Miller v. Miller
Idaho Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
745 P.2d 294 (1987)
113 Idaho 415
Pete MILLER, Plaintiff-Respondent/Cross-Appellant,
v.
E. Paul MILLER, Defendant-Appellant/Cross-Respondent.
No. 16390.
Supreme Court of Idaho.
October 26, 1987.
Racine, Olson, Nye, Cooper & Budge, Chartered, Pocatello, for defendant-appellant/cross-respondent E. Paul Miller; W. Marcus W. Nye, Pocatello, argued.
Hawley Troxell Ennis & Hawley, Pocatello, for plaintiff-respondent/cross-appellant Pete Miller; Thomas J. Holmes, Pocatello, argued.
BISTLINE, Justice.
In May 1984 the Bannock County Commissioners, pursuant to a petition, had formed a herd district which…
Also in this document: Concurring in part, dissenting in part.
2Cases cited17 opinions
- State v. ClarkIdaho Supreme Court · 1965
- Maguire v. YankeIdaho Supreme Court · 1978
- Nagel v. HammondIdaho Supreme Court · 1965
- Clyde Hess Distributing Co. v. Bonneville CountyIdaho Supreme Court · 1949
- Beinhorn v. GriswoldMontana Supreme Court · 1902
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.