Legal Opinion

Miller v. Miller

Idaho Supreme Court

Decided October 26, 1987No. 16390Published

1Opinion of the Court

745 P.2d 294 (1987)

113 Idaho 415

Pete MILLER, Plaintiff-Respondent/Cross-Appellant,

v.

E. Paul MILLER, Defendant-Appellant/Cross-Respondent.

No. 16390.

Supreme Court of Idaho.

October 26, 1987.

Racine, Olson, Nye, Cooper & Budge, Chartered, Pocatello, for defendant-appellant/cross-respondent E. Paul Miller; W. Marcus W. Nye, Pocatello, argued.

Hawley Troxell Ennis & Hawley, Pocatello, for plaintiff-respondent/cross-appellant Pete Miller; Thomas J. Holmes, Pocatello, argued.

BISTLINE, Justice.

In May 1984 the Bannock County Commissioners, pursuant to a petition, had formed a herd district which…

Also in this document: Concurring in part, dissenting in part.

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. State v. ClarkIdaho Supreme Court · 1965
  2. Maguire v. YankeIdaho Supreme Court · 1978
  3. Nagel v. HammondIdaho Supreme Court · 1965
  4. Clyde Hess Distributing Co. v. Bonneville CountyIdaho Supreme Court · 1949
  5. Beinhorn v. GriswoldMontana Supreme Court · 1902

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API