Marchbanks v. Roll
Idaho Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
SCHROEDER, Chief Justice.
David and Sheila Marchbanks (the March-banks) obtained injunctive relief and damages against Mary and Betty Jo Roll (the Rolls) for alleged failure to maintain fences and trespass. The Rolls claim the district court erroneously failed to take judicial notice that Canyon County’s designated herd districts contain lands administered by the Bureau of Land Management (BLM) and erroneously concluded that their property lies within a valid herd district.
I
FACTUAL AND PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND
The Marchbanks own and reside on a farm in Canyon County, Idaho, where they cultivate…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Vaughan v. AtkinsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
- State v. DoeIdaho Supreme Court · 2004
- Cox v. CoxIdaho Supreme Court · 1962
- Frasier v. CarterIdaho Supreme Court · 1968
- Evans v. Hara's, Inc.Idaho Supreme Court · 1993
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- State v. Victor Garcia-RodriguezIdaho Supreme Court · 2017
- Doe v. DoeIdaho Supreme Court · 2011
- Doe v. DoeIdaho Supreme Court · 2011
- RE: Guardianship of minor childrenIdaho Supreme Court · 2011
- State v. Victor Garcia-RodriguezIdaho Supreme Court · 2017
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.