Legal Opinion
City of Aurora Ex Rel. Aurora Water v. PS Systems, Inc.
District Court, D. Colorado
Decided June 25, 2010No. Civil Action 07-cv-02371-PAB-BNBPublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
PHILIP A. BRIMMER, District Judge.
This patent case comes before the Court on the motion to dismiss for lack of subject-matter jurisdiction filed by plaintiff City of Aurora (“Aurora”) and third-party defendant Grimm Construction Company, Inc. (doing business as and hereinafter referred to as “Garney”) [Docket No. 149]. Pursuant to Federal Rules of Civil Procedure 12(b)(1) and 12(h)(8), the motion requests dismissal of the counterclaim and third-party claim filed by defendants PS Systems, Inc. and RAR Group, LLC (collectively, the “patentees”). 1 At a May 6, 2010 hearing in this matter,…
2Cases cited28 opinions
- MedImmune, Inc. v. Genentech, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Northeastern Florida Chapter of the Associated General Contractors of America v. City of JacksonvilleSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
- David Holt, as Personal Representative of the Estates of James W. Holt and Joan Holt, Deceased v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1995
- Georgia-Pacific Corp. v. United States Plywood Corp.District Court, S.D. New York · 1970
- Lucent Technologies, Inc. v. Gateway, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2009
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Biax Corp. v. Nvidia Corp.District Court, D. Colorado · 2010