Holston v. Sports Authority, Inc.

ORDER

CARNES, District Judge.

The above-captioned employment discrimination action is before the Court on defendant’s Objections [22] to the Magistrate Judge’s Report and Recommendation [21], which recommended granting in part and denying in part defendant’s Motion for Summary Judgment [12]. The Magistrate Judge recommended that defendant’s motion be granted as to plaintiffs state law claims of intentional infliction of emotional distress and negligent retention, but recommended that it be denied as to plaintiffs claims of race discrimination and retaliation under Title VII of the Civil Rights…