Legal Opinion

Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fe Railway Co. v. Union Tank Car Co.

Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit

Decided October 12, 1979No. 79-1182PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

TONE, Circuit Judge.

Union Tank Car Company leased 148 of its tank cars for use in Mexico. On termination of the leases the cars were transported, pursuant to Union Tank’s directions, from points in Mexico to repair and maintenance facilities in the United States. The issue in this case is whether Union Tank must pay freight charges for the movement of the cars from the Mexican border to the repair and maintenance facilities. The answer depends upon the interpretation of two tariff provisions and provisions of the Interstate Commerce Act. The Interstate Commerce Commission held Union Tank…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Securities & Exchange Commission v. Chenery Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1947
  2. Bowman Transportation, Inc. v. Arkansas-Best Freight System, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1975
  3. United States v. Western Pacific RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1956
  4. Bankers Trust Co. v. MallisSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
  5. Unemployment Compensation Comm'n of Alaska v. AragonSupreme Court of the United States · 1946

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. The Atchison, Topeka and Santa Fe Railway Company, a Corporation, Plaintiff v. Union Tank Car Company, a Corporation, Union Tank Car Company v. United States of America and Interstate Commerce Commission, Respondents- and the Atchison, Topeka and Santa Fe Railway Company, a Corporation, InterveningCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1979
  2. Evans Products Co., General American Transportation Corp., and Interstate Railcar Services, Inc. v. Interstate Commerce Commission and United States of America, Chicago Heights Terminal Transfer Railroad Company, Intervening Tank Lining Corp. v. Interstate Commerce Commission and United States of AmericaCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1984

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API