Legal Opinion
Commissioner of Labor v. Chudzik
New York Supreme Court
Decided March 30, 1984PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
Edward M. Horey, J.
The motion before the court has been made ex parte by the Commissioner of Labor of the State of New York. It seeks an extension of a levy upon personal property. It is alleged that the authority for the motion and extension is CPLR 5232 (subd [a]).
The affirmation of the Senior Attorney for the Commissioner of Labor, Chaim S. Malks, Esq., on a printed form with additional typed information completing blank spaces or adding to printed information recites the following facts, to wit: (1) warrants for New York unemployment insurance taxes were docketed…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Mullane v. Central Hanover Bank & Trust Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1950
- Carey v. PiphusSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Deary v. Guardian Loan Co., Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 1982
- Cole v. Goldberger, Pedersen & HochronNew York Supreme Court · 1978
- Schindler v. Industrial Commissioner of the New York State Department of Labor (In Re Reiber's Inn of Westchester, Inc.)District Court, S.D. New York · 1980
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Commissioner of Labor v. ChudzikNew York Supreme Court · 1984
- Commissioner of Labor v. ChudzikAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1986