Legal Opinion
Commissioner of Labor v. Chudzik
New York Supreme Court
Decided September 28, 1984PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
Edward M. Horey, J.
Once again the Commissioner of Labor seeks to renew an application for an extension of a levy on personal property of Stanley Chudzik, the judgment debtor.
To review briefly, an initial ex parte application to renew a levy made by the Commissioner through attorneys in the Department of Labor was denied by this court in a detailed decision dated March 30, 1984. (See, Commissioner of Labor v Chudzik, 123 Misc 2d 959.) The denial was based upon determined consti*969tutional grounds of inadequacy of notice to the judgment debtor involved and constitutional…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Stuart v. . PalmerNew York Court of Appeals · 1878
- Coe v. Armour Fertilizer WorksSupreme Court of the United States · 1915
- Roller v. HollySupreme Court of the United States · 1900
- Central of Georgia Railway Co. v. WrightSupreme Court of the United States · 1907
- Security Trust & Safety Vault Co. v. City of LexingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1906
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Community National Bank & Trust Co. of New York v. Persky (In Re Persky)United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. New York · 1987
- Commissioner of Labor v. ChudzikAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1986