State v. Forte
Court of Appeals of Arizona
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
ECKERSTROM, Presiding Judge.
¶ 1 After appellant Jeremiah Forte pled guilty to aggravated assault with a deadly weapon or dangerous instrument, the tidal court suspended the imposition of sentence and placed him on a five-year term of intensive probation. Forte later violated the terms of his probation and, at a disposition hearing at which Forte appeared only via an interactive audiovisual system, the court sentenced him to a mitigated term of 2.5 years’ imprisonment. On appeal, Forte argues the court violated his rights to counsel and to be present at sentencing by conducting the…
2Cases cited35 opinions
- Arizona v. FulminanteSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
- Mincey v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Illinois v. AllenSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
- United States v. Gonzalez-LopezSupreme Court of the United States · 2006
- Geders v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- State of Arizona v. Reuben Renee CotaCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2014
- State v. PONSARTCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2010
- State of Arizona v. Vincent Michael AllenCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2014
- White v. StateCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2025
- State of Arizona v. John George Ponsart Jr.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 2010
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.