Legal Opinion
Ford Motor Credit Co. v. Thompson MacHine, Inc.
Supreme Judicial Court of Maine
Decided October 28, 1994PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
RUDMAN, Justice.
This is the second time this case has come before us. Ford Motor Credit Company (FMCC) now appeals from the Superior Court’s (Cumberland County, Lipez, J.) denial of a motion for an additional attachment in the amount of $57,000. In October 1992 we affirmed the grant of attachments against the same defendants — Thompson Machine, Inc. (Thompson), its owner Lawrence Caldwell, and his wife Sandra Caldwell — in amounts totalling collectively almost $2 million. The court’s refusal to grant FMCC’s request for the additional attachment was based on a factual finding that FMCC had…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Camden National Bank v. St. ClairSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1973
- Reuter v. Citizens & Northern BankSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1991
- United States v. H & S Realty Co., Etc.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1987
- Graffam v. WraySupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1981
- United States v. H & S REALTY CO.District Court, D. Maine · 1986
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Topical Jewelers, Inc. v. Nationsbank, NaDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2000
- ROC-Century Associates v. GiuntaSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1995
- Tropical Jewelers, Inc. v. NATIONSBANK, NADistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2000
- Fiatallis North America, Inc. v. HillSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1994
- Ford Motor Credit Co. v. MooreSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1995