Legal Opinion

Application of MacH

South Dakota Supreme Court

Decided January 31, 1947No. File No. 8564PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Joseph Mach was the owner of a certain quarter section of land in Yankton County upon which he and his family resided. On November 11, 1901 Joseph conveyed this land to his wife, the deed reciting: "This deed is made upon condition that a contract of even date herewith is fully and faithfully performed." The contract is as follows:

"Agreement

`This Agreement made and entered into this 11th day of November, A.D. 1901, by and between Julia Mach, party of the first part and Joseph Mach, party of the second part, both of the County of Yankton, State of South Dakota, Witnesseth:

"That whereas, Joseph…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Henry v. KnightIndiana Court of Appeals · 1919
  2. Loar v. PolingWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1929
  3. Hegge v. HeggeSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1921
  4. Ainsenbrey v. HensleySouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1945
  5. Peters v. PetersSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1934

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Regie De L'Assurance Automobile Du Quebec v. JensenSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1987
  2. In Re Trasks' CharolaisUnited States Bankruptcy Court, D. South Dakota · 1988
  3. Met Life Auto & Home Insurance Co. v. LesterSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2006
  4. In Re WebbDistrict Court, S.D. Indiana · 1958
  5. Hult v. EbingerOregon Supreme Court · 1960

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API