Legal Opinion
McLean v. GT Duke Co., Inc.
Court of Appeals of Georgia
Decided February 18, 1957No. 36462PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtNichols, J.
The garnishees’ first special ground of their motion for new trial is but a restatement of their motion to dismiss and plea to the jurisdiction and will therefore not be considered separately.
The decision of this court in Charles S. Martin Distributing Co. v. Southern Furnace Co., 88 Ga. App. 339 (2) (76 S. E. 2d 662), controls this assignment of error and requires an affirmance of the ruling thereon by the trial court. The effect of the ruling in that case was that the Civil Court of Fulton County has jurisdiction over garnishment cases wheré the judgment on which the garnishment proceedings…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Morris Plan Bank of Georgia v. SimmonsSupreme Court of Georgia · 1946
- State Ex Rel. Zagula v. GrossiWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1964
- Charles S. Martin Distributing Co. v. Southern Furnace Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1953
- Central of Georgia Railway Co. v. WrightCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1909
- Shorter v. Moore, Trimble & Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1871
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Crystal Laundry & Cleaners, Inc. v. Continental Finance & Loan Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1958
- Thacker Construction Co. v. WilliamsCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1980
- Roquemore v. GoldsteinCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1959
- Branch v. HumanSupreme Court of Georgia · 1959
- Willett Lincoln-Mercury, Inc. v. LarsonCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1981
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.