State v. Sweet
Oregon Supreme Court
Appeal from Wasco County. Ansel W. Sweet was an attorney at law, and in that capacity collected some nine hundred dollars for a client, Reuben Breed. This money so collected, Sweet embezzled, converted to his own use, and failed to account therefor.
1Opinion of the CourtBoise, J.
The indictment charges defendant with embezzlement, calling the offense by that name, and using substantially the language of the 22d Section, page 216 of the Statutes, defining the offense. The statute is as follows: “ If any agent of any private person shall embezzle or fraudulently convert to his own use, without the consent of his employer, any money which shall have come to his possession by virtue of such employment, he shall be deemed to have committed the crime of larceny.” The indictment charges the prisoner with embezzlement, setting out the facts constituting the crime, and the…
2Cited by13 opinions
- State v. ReinhartOregon Supreme Court · 1895
- State v. DormitzerOregon Supreme Court · 1927
- State v. BrowningOregon Supreme Court · 1905
- State v. BossartNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1932
- State v. SchabenSupreme Court of Kansas · 1904
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.