Lammers v. Pacific Electric Ry. Co.
California Supreme Court
The facts are stated in thé opinion of the court. Frank Karr, B. C. Gortner, E'. E. Morris, W. B. Millar and C. W. Cornell for Appellant.
1Opinion of the CourtWilbub, J.
The facts are correctly stated in the opinion of the district court of appeal, and we adopt that statement of the facts, but with certain minor changes. For that reason we do not use quotation marks.
This is an appeal from a judgment awarding plaintiff the sum of two thousand five hundred dollars as damages for personal injuries sustained, so it is alleged, as the result of being wrongfully expelled by defendant’s conductor from its passenger train while in a helpless condition and unable to care for himself at a time and place where he was likely to be injured by other ears of defendant which…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Cruse v. AdenIllinois Supreme Court · 1889
- Fagg's Admr. v. Louisville & N. R. R. Co.Court of Appeals of Kentucky · 1901
- Haug v. Great Northern Railway Co.North Dakota Supreme Court · 1898
- State v. W.B. A. Elec. Rd. Co.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1917
- L. & N. R. R. v. Johnson Admx.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1895
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by29 opinions
- Vesely v. SagerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1971
- Cole v. RushCalifornia Supreme Court · 1955
- Ennabe v. ManosaCalifornia Supreme Court · 2014
- Fleckner v. DionneCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1949
- Hitson v. M. J. DwyerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1943
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.