Legal Opinion

City of Honolulu v. Caetano

Hawaii Supreme Court

Decided July 18, 1927No. 1736PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT BY

PERRY, C. J.

This was a suit for the condemnation of land required for the extension of a public highway. The essential allegations of the petition were that the plaintiff, a municipal corporation invested with the power to acquire land by condemnation for public purposes, desired to acquire certain parcels of land therein described for public purposes, to-wit, for the extension of a street known as Bishop Street, that the respondents claimed to be the owners of the landá or of interests therein and that the board of supervisors had approved of the acquisition and…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Gagnon v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1904
  2. In re DoleHawaii Supreme Court · 1903
  3. Egan v. EganCalifornia Supreme Court · 1891

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Roxas v. MarcosHawaii Supreme Court · 1998
  2. Korsak v. Hawaii Permanente Medical Group, Inc.Hawaii Supreme Court · 2000
  3. Housing Finance & Development Corp. v. FergusonHawaii Supreme Court · 1999
  4. McKeague v. TalbertHawaii Intermediate Court of Appeals · 1983
  5. Sussel v. Civil Service CommissionHawaii Supreme Court · 1993

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API