Legal Opinion
Wolf v. Reynolds Electrical & Engineering Co.
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided June 26, 1962No. 17372PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
JAMESON, District Judge.
Plaintiff, a citizen of Illinois, instituted this action to recover damages for personal injuries sustained on February 21, 1955, as the result of a collision between a motor vehicle in which plaintiff was riding and a motor vehicle operated by the defendants Reynolds Electrical & Engineering Co., Inc., a Texas Corporation, and Reynolds Electrical Corporation, a Nevada Corporation, through their agent and employee, the defendant Russell Martin, a citizen of Nevada. At the close of plaintiff's case, the trial court entered a judgment of dismissal in favor of all of the…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- United States v. United States Gypsum Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1948
- Puckhaber v. Southern Pacific Co.California Supreme Court · 1901
- United States v. United States Gypsum Co.District Court, District of Columbia · 1946
- Rexall Drug Co. v. NihillCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1960
- Independent-Eastern Torpedo Co. v. AckermanCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1954
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- British Airways Board, 1 v. The Boeing CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1978
- Kelly v. International Harvester CompanySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1971
- Richard W. Neely v. St. Paul Fire and Marine Insurance Company and Standard Oil Company of CaliforniaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1978
- Psg Co., a Corporation, and Philip S. Greenberg v. Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1969
- V. L. Johnson, D/B/A v. L. Johnson Lumber Co. v. Chicago, Milwaukee, St. Paul & Pacific Railroad Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1968
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.