Legal Opinion
Norian Corp. v. Stryker Corp.
District Court, N.D. California
Decided June 13, 2002No. C 01-00016 WHAPublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER DENYING MOTION FOR NEW TRIAL AND GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART MOTION FOR JUDGMENT
ALSUP, District Judge.
INTRODUCTION
As this order on post-trial motions will be the last ruling by the district court before appeal, the following procedural summary may assist the court of appeals. Although some relief is required under FRCP 50, the ultimate outcome is not changed. Judgment for defendant is still required.
PROCEDURAL HISTORY
On January 3, 2001, plaintiff Norian Corporation commenced this action against defendant Stryker Corporation, alleging that its BoneSource product infringes United…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Herbert Markman and Positek, Inc. v. Westview Instruments, Inc. And Althon Enterprises, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1995
- Eibel Process Co. v. Minnesota & Ontario Paper Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1923
- Constant v. Advanced Micro-Devices, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1988
- Richard C. Price v. Dale R. SymsekCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1993
- Knapp v. MorssSupreme Court of the United States · 1893
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Norian Corporation v. Stryker Corporation, Defendant-CrossCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2004
- Lake v. CoreCivicDistrict Court, D. Montana · 2025
- Norian Corporation v. Stryker Corporation, Defendant-CrossCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2004