Legal Opinion

Norian Corporation v. Stryker Corporation, Defendant-Cross

Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Decided April 6, 2004No. 02-1490, 02-1506, 02-1507Published

1Opinion of the Court

363 F.3d 1321

NORIAN CORPORATION, Plaintiff-Appellant,

v.

STRYKER CORPORATION, Defendant-Cross Appellant.

No. 02-1490.

No. 02-1506.

No. 02-1507.

United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit.

April 6, 2004.

COPYRIGHT MATERIAL OMITTED COPYRIGHT MATERIAL OMITTED Brian M. Poissant, Pennie & Edmonds, LLP, of New York, NY, argued for plaintiff-appellant. With him on the brief were Daniel L. Malone and Eric C. Stops. Of counsel was Carl Bretscher, Pennie & Edmonds LLP, of Washington, DC.

Gregory J. Vogler, McAndrews, Held & Mallow, Ltd., of Chicago, IL, argued for defendant-cross appellant. With him on the…

Also in this document: Concurring in part, dissenting in part.

2Cases cited28 opinions

  1. United States v. Socony-Vacuum Oil Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1940
  2. American Hoist & Derrick Company, Cross-Appellee v. Sowa & Sons, Inc., Cross-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1984
  3. Kingsdown Medical Consultants, Ltd. And E.R. Squibb & Sons, Inc. v. Hollister IncorporatedCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1988
  4. Ccs Fitness, Inc. v. Brunswick Corporation and Its Division Life FitnessCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2002
  5. Sage Products, Inc. v. Devon Industries, Inc., Defendant/cross-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1997

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API