State v. Wilson
Ohio Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtSchneider, J.
Appellant first contends that he was denied due process of law when the trial court overruled his motion to have the blood stains found on his clothing and the bullets taken from him and the decedent examined by an expert selected by him.
Prior to trial appellant filed a nine-part discovery motion pursuant to which the trial court allowed him to inspect his clothing, the bullet taken from his hand, the bullets and weapons taken from and around the pony keg, and the results of all ballistic, fingerprint and paraffin tests made on behalf of the state.
Appellant did not request the right to…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Schmerber v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Witherspoon v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Swain v. AlabamaSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
- Ohio v. HymoreOhio Supreme Court · 1967
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by37 opinions
- State v. SmithOhio Supreme Court · 1997
- State v. MaurerOhio Supreme Court · 1984
- State v. JenkinsOhio Supreme Court · 1984
- State v. WilliamsOhio Supreme Court · 1983
- State v. MoralesOhio Supreme Court · 1987
32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.